Health Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 18;8(8):e71150. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.71150. eCollection 2025 Aug.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The use of virtual technologies in prenatal care has significantly increased, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, the implications of this approach remain a topic of discussion. This review aimed to categorize virtual-based prenatal care methods and their reported clinical and nonclinical outcomes.
METHODS: This scoping review was conducted by searching the Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, SID, Irandoc, Magiran databases, and Google Scholar search engine from January 2005 to February 2021 and completed until December 2023. Our included studies were quantitative and review studies in English that mentioned virtual prenatal care and related outcomes. We followed the narrative approach for presenting and synthesizing results and PRISMA-ScR guidelines for the accompanying explanation.
RESULTS: After retrieving 1324 studies and removing duplicates, 35 articles were reviewed. We divided virtual-based prenatal care into two main categories: only using virtual methods and modified care models by virtual methods. Mhealth was the most widely used virtual care method due to its accessibility to most mothers, low cost, and use of dedicated apps. The reported outcomes were also classified into seven subcategories. Maternal and neonatal outcomes, maternal and provider satisfaction, and change in patient knowledge, attitude, and practice were the three most commonly reported outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Improvement of a variety of clinical and nonclinical outcomes is anticipated to facilitate the effective implementation of tailored virtual interventions for mothers, ultimately improving health outcomes for both mothers and fetuses.
PMID:40837720 | PMC:PMC12361639 | DOI:10.1002/hsr2.71150
