Value Health. 2025 May 6:S1098-3015(25)02326-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2025.04.2161. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The EQ-5D-5L is widely used to measure adults’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The EQ-5D-Y-5L is a corresponding measure adapted for children/adolescents, in principle allowing HRQoL to be measured consistently from childhood to adulthood. However, little is known about how their measurement properties compare. This study investigated the relationship between EQ-5D-Y-5L and EQ-5D-5L in adolescents and compared their psychometric performance.
METHODS: The P-MIC Study includes a sample of 591 adolescents (aged 12-18) who completed both EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-Y-5L. Responses were compared descriptively and HRQoL summarised using the level sum score. Acceptability, feasibility, ceiling effects, convergence, test-retest reliability, and known-group validity were assessed overall and in sub-groups defined by special health care needs (SHCN), mental health concerns (MHC) and age (12-13, 14-16 and 17-18 years).
RESULTS: Ceiling effects were lower for EQ-5D-Y-5L than EQ-5D-5L. The EQ-5D-Y-5L better differentiated between adolescents with and without SHCN and MHC than EQ-5D-5L, while EQ-5D-5L showed better test-retest reliability in adolescents with SHCN and MHC. We found strong correlations between dimensions anticipated to be correlated. EQ-5D-Y-5L identified a higher incidence of self-reported HRQoL problems than EQ-5D-5L both overall and particularly in mental health.
CONCLUSIONS: While both instruments are valid for measuring HRQoL in adolescents 12-18 years old, EQ-5D-Y-5L had some psychometric advantages. The instruments are closely related, but differences in their descriptive systems produce differences in self-reported HRQoL. Results highlight potential discontinuities in HRQoL measured using age-specific instruments which may be important for their use in economic models that involves transitions between age groups.
PMID:40339642 | DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2025.04.2161
