Psychol Med. 2025 Nov 5;55:e335. doi: 10.1017/S0033291725102389.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Early intervention (EI) for first-episode psychosis (FEP) mainly focuses on adolescents and young adults. Previous evaluation demonstrated superiority of 2-year EI program (EASY) over standard care in outcome improvement in young people (15-25 years) with FEP in Hong-Kong. However, effectiveness of territory-wide extended EASY, which provides 3-year EI service also to adult patients aged ≥26 years, has not been systematically examined.
METHODS: This study adopted historical control-case design, comparing patients aged 26-55 years who had received extended EI (EI-group, n = 160) with those managed by standard psychiatric care (SC-group, n = 160) prior to an implementation of extended EI service on a comprehensive range of outcomes encompassing duration of untreated psychosis (DUP), pathway to care, symptom severity, psychosocial functioning, subjective quality of life and service utilization over 3 years of psychiatric follow-up, using systematic medical-record review and follow-up interview assessment.
RESULTS: Our results showed that EI-group had significantly shorter DUP than SC-group. Additionally, EI-group displayed fewer average positive symptoms in the first and second year of follow-up, lower levels of negative and depressive symptoms, better global and social functioning, and higher quality of life on physical domain than SC-group at 3 years of follow-up. Our findings indicate that adult FEP patients receiving 3-year extended EI service had better clinical and functional outcomes than those managed by standard psychiatric care.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results thus provide real-world evidence supporting the superiority and implementation of 3-year extended EASY program for adult FEP patients in shortening of treatment delay and improvement of symptom and functional outcomes.
PMID:41189457 | DOI:10.1017/S0033291725102389
