Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2026 Mar 31. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2025.0713. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
Despite compelling epidemiological evidence linking vitamin D deficiency to adverse outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, and cystic fibrosis, randomized controlled trials have consistently failed to demonstrate clinically meaningful benefits from oral vitamin D supplementation. This disconnect between observational associations and interventional evidence represents a significant paradox in pulmonary medicine. Recent meta-analyses have found limited protective or therapeutic effects of oral supplementation on exacerbation rates, lung function, hospitalizations, or quality of life measures. We propose that this therapeutic failure reflects not a lack of vitamin D’s efficacy but rather a fundamental limitation in the route of delivery. Oral vitamin D supplementation undergoes hepatic metabolism and systemic dilution before reaching respiratory tissues. High expression of CYP24A1, the vitamin D-inactivating enzyme, in pulmonary vasculature suggests that orally delivered vitamin D may be degraded before reaching the lung lumen. The respiratory epithelium possesses complete machinery for vitamin D activation, and vitamin D receptors are expressed throughout airway epithelial and immune cells, making direct pulmonary delivery mechanistically feasible. Pre-clinical studies demonstrate that nebulized or inhaled vitamin D reduces inflammation, protects epithelial barrier function, and improves lung function in murine models of respiratory disease without producing off-target systemic effects or hypercalcemia. Direct lung delivery of vitamin D represents an unexplored therapeutic strategy that could transform management of chronic respiratory diseases, like COPD, by achieving local therapeutic concentrations while minimizing systemic exposure. Clinical trials investigating safety, dosing optimization, and efficacy are warranted.
PMID:41950523 | DOI:10.15326/jcopdf.2025.0713
