J Trauma Nurs. 2025 Aug 4. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000872. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Resuscitative thoracotomy, performed in only 10%-15% of pediatric thoracic trauma cases, yields a dismally low survival rate of 3.4%. As such, an investigation into the mechanisms of such high mortality associated with this emergent procedure is warranted.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of initially hemodynamically stable pediatric patients requiring an emergency department thoracotomy (EDT) at pediatric trauma centers (PTC), combined adult/PTCs (CTC), and adult-only trauma centers (ATC).
METHODS: The American College of Surgeons-Trauma Quality Improvement Program database (2017-2021) was utilized in this retrospective cohort analysis to evaluate outcomes among initially hemodynamically stable pediatric (age <18) patients with moderate-severe Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS chest >2) blunt or penetrating thoracic trauma undergoing an EDT. The primary outcome of interest was mortality (defined as emergency department, 24-hour, and in-hospital mortality) evaluated by trauma center type.
RESULTS: A total of 314 patients were identified, with 219 patients (69.7%) treated at ATCs, 77 patients (24.5%) treated at CTCs, and 18 patients (5.7%) treated at PTCs. There was no significant association between 24-hour mortality and treatment at a CTC when compared to treatment at an ATC for patients with penetrating (odds ratio [OR] 0.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.00, 1444.90], p = .501) or blunt (OR 0.26, 95% CI [0.01, 7.98], p = .440) injuries.
DISCUSSION: Among initially hemodynamically stable pediatric trauma patients with moderate-severe blunt or penetrating thoracic injuries undergoing EDT, patients treated at a CTC, when compared to an ATC, showed comparable mortality.
PMID:40759036 | DOI:10.1097/JTN.0000000000000872
