Neurology. 2025 Jan 14;104(1):e210106. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000210106. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hypotonia is a relatively common finding among infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Consideration of genetic testing is recommended early in the care of infants with unexplained hypotonia. We aimed to assess the diagnostic yield and overall impact of exome and genome sequencing (ES and GS).
METHODS: Consecutive infants with hypotonia were identified from research and clinical databases across 5 teaching hospitals in United States, Canada, United Kingdom, and Australia. Inclusion criteria included NICU admission and genetic evaluation. Infants with a known explanation for hypotonia were excluded. Data regarding infant characteristics, genetic testing, and diagnoses were collected. The primary outcome was identification of a molecular diagnosis. Impact on care was a secondary outcome. The Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: We identified 147 infants with unexplained hypotonia. The median gestational age was 39 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 36-42 weeks), 77 (52%) were female, and the median age was 8 days at the time of evaluation (IQR 2-19 days). Eighty (54%) had hypotonia as the main clinical feature while 67 (46%) had additional multisystem involvement. Seventy-five (51%) underwent rapid ES, 44 (30%) rapid GS, 2 (1%) both ES and GS, and 26 (18%) were admitted before ES or GS became available. Of the 121 infants who underwent ES and/or GS, 72 (60%) had the primary outcome of a molecular diagnosis. In addition, 2 infants with mitochondrial genome variants were diagnosed by mitochondrial GS after negative ES, and one infant needed targeted testing to identify a short tandem repeat expansion missed by GS. The proportion diagnosed by ES and GS was not different between infants with hypotonia as the primary finding (37/56, 66%) and infants with multisystemic symptoms (35/65, 54%, odds ratio [OR] 1.7, CI 0.8-3.7, p value = 0.20). Testing was more likely to have an impact on care for infants receiving a genetic diagnosis (57/66 vs 14/33, OR 8.4, CI 2.9-26.1, p = 1.0E-05).
DISCUSSION: Rapid ES and GS provided a molecular diagnosis for most of the infants with unexplained hypotonia who underwent testing. Further studies are needed to assess the generalizability of these findings as increased access to genetic testing becomes available.
CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that in unexplained neonatal hypotonia, rapid ES or GS adds diagnostic specificity.
PMID:39700446 | DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000210106
