Evidence-based advances in minimally invasive surgery in infants with congenital gastrointestinal anomalies: a narrative review
Evidence-based advances in minimally invasive surgery in infants with congenital gastrointestinal anomalies: a narrative review

Evidence-based advances in minimally invasive surgery in infants with congenital gastrointestinal anomalies: a narrative review

Transl Pediatr. 2024 May 31;13(5):791-802. doi: 10.21037/tp-23-611. Epub 2024 May 20.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been widely utilized to manage congenital gastrointestinal (GI) anomalies in children during the last two decades. Currently, MIS has a proven track-record for its feasibility and provides multiple benefits including better cosmesis, less trauma, and faster recovery in neonates and infants. However, it remains controversial whether MIS provides better definitive outcomes in pediatric patients with GI anomalies, especially among neonates. We aim to review the recent developments of MIS in infants with GI defects, assisting surgeons in making decisions and improving patient outcomes.

METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and Web of Science’s core collection was performed using terms of MIS techniques and congenital GI anomalies.

KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: This review summarizes recent evidence-based advances of MIS in infants with congenital GI defects and potential future strategies based on evidence. Better cosmetic results, less postoperative pain, and an accelerated recovery have been shown to be common advantages of MIS relative to open approaches. Technical hurdles and metabolic disturbance were reported to be the main reasons for the decisions of open approach.

CONCLUSIONS: Advanced techniques of MIS have made more precise manipulations and better outcomes possible, even for newborns. At the same time, surgeons should not be afraid to use an open approach in certain circumstances due to technical limitations or patient tolerance. The difficulty infants face in expressing their true feelings underscores the need for systematic and objective assessment tools to evaluate surgical outcomes.

PMID:38840689 | PMC:PMC11148739 | DOI:10.21037/tp-23-611