Dialectical Behavior Therapy Programming for Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Implementation Outcomes
Dialectical Behavior Therapy Programming for Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Implementation Outcomes

Dialectical Behavior Therapy Programming for Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Implementation Outcomes

J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2024 Nov 20:1-16. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2024.2426142. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide an updated examination of the adolescent Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT) literature and synthesize study findings across treatment settings (e.g. inpatient, outpatient, school), and treatment levels (e.g. clinical intervention, targeted, universal prevention). We also provide meta-analytic findings of the impact of DBT across key problem behaviors: depression, emotion dysregulation, suicidal and self-harm behaviors, externalizing problems, and eating disorders.

METHOD: A reference database search was used to identify studies conducted on adolescent DBT interventions from 2000 through 2023 (N = 72). In addition to ensuring that the review process conformed to the PRISMA statement, we independently verified that each study met inclusion criteria before triple coding each article to examine variables of interest and extracted outcome data needed to conduct meta-analyses.

RESULTS: DBT appears to demonstrate effectiveness in improving mental health outcomes in adolescents across a range of psychiatric problems. To meet these treatment needs, DBT interventions have been appropriately adapted based on care setting, suggesting empirical support in inpatient, residential, partial hospitalization, and intensive outpatient programs, as well as in outpatient settings, juvenile correctional facilities, and schools.

CONCLUSIONS: The growing evidence base for adolescent DBT appears to reflect its promise and versatile clinical utility. Clinical implications and recommendations for future directions are discussed, including the need for more randomized controls and representation of diverse communities.

PMID:39565348 | DOI:10.1080/15374416.2024.2426142