Debate: Where to next for universal school-based mental health interventions? Tensions in prevention – To build better school-based programming, we must start with what we know
Debate: Where to next for universal school-based mental health interventions? Tensions in prevention – To build better school-based programming, we must start with what we know

Debate: Where to next for universal school-based mental health interventions? Tensions in prevention – To build better school-based programming, we must start with what we know

Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2025 Feb 28. doi: 10.1111/camh.12758. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Researchers and education leaders have suggested that universal school-based prevention programs could improve youth mental health at a population level, yet recent trials of universal school-based prevention programs (e.g., MYRIAD, CSC) found null or iatrogenic results. In this debate piece, we argue that these results must be contextualized alongside existing knowledge that universal programs are ideally implemented within multitiered systems, promoting student autonomy tends to promote uptake and adherence, and individual trials do not outweigh decades of academic and community expertise. We offer suggestions for moving forward in research on and implementation of universal school-based prevention programs.

PMID:40018868 | DOI:10.1111/camh.12758