Front Pediatr. 2024 Sep 20;12:1417628. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1417628. eCollection 2024.
ABSTRACT
AIM: To compare volume-driven and cue-based feeding of low birth weight preterm infants, regarding short-term outcomes, including transition to oral feeds, weight gain, and length of stay.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Feeding and weight gain outcomes were compared between infants fed by volume-driven and cue-based feeds. The groups were subdivided by birth weight categories.
RESULTS: The study group included 240 low birth weight preterm infants born before 34 weeks of gestation, 120 infants fed by volume-driven feeding were compared to 120 infants fed by cue-based feeding. The groups were sub-analyzed by birth weight categories: <1,500 g and 1,500-2,500 g. Study groups were comparable regarding baseline characteristics and neonatal morbidities. Infants fed by cue-based feeding were more likely to achieve full oral feeding faster and at an earlier gestational age. Infants with a birth weight <1,500 g were less likely to experience adverse respiratory episodes during cue-based feeding. Although the rate of weight gain was reduced in cue-based feeding in the heavier infant group, discharge weight, breastfeeding rates, and length of stay were comparable between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Cue-based feeding results in faster transition to full oral feeding in very low birth weight preterm infants and at an earlier gestational age.
PMID:39372654 | PMC:PMC11449709 | DOI:10.3389/fped.2024.1417628
