Cardiovascular magnetic resonance semi-automated threshold-based post-processing of right ventricular volumes in repaired tetralogy of Fallot
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance semi-automated threshold-based post-processing of right ventricular volumes in repaired tetralogy of Fallot

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance semi-automated threshold-based post-processing of right ventricular volumes in repaired tetralogy of Fallot

Radiol Med. 2024 Oct 30. doi: 10.1007/s11547-024-01908-6. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold-standard to estimate right ventricular (RV) volumes, which are key for clinical management of patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF). Semi-automated threshold-based methods (SAT) have been proposed for CMR post-processing as alternatives to fully manual standard tracing. We investigated the impact of SAT on RV analysis using different thresholds in rTOF patients.

METHODS: RV volumes and mass were estimated using SAT and standard fully manual tracing methods in rTOF patients. Two threshold levels were set for SAT, i.e., default 50 (SAT-50) and 30 (SAT-30). RV stroke volumes (SV) were compared to main pulmonary artery forward flow (MPA-FF). Post-processing time, intra- and interobserver variabilities were compared across methods.

RESULTS: Sixty-two CMRs of rTOF patients were analyzed. Compared to the standard fully manual tracing, no significant differences in RV mass, volumes and ejection fraction were observed using SAT-30, whereas SAT-50 significantly underestimated RV end-diastolic-volume index (EDVi) by 10.4% (mean difference of – 11.8 ± 6.2 ml/m2, p 0.03) and overestimated RV mass index by 21.8% (mean difference of 14.2 ± 11.9 g/m2, p 0.002). Compared to MPA-FF, RVSV by standard fully manual method and SAT-30 showed minor biases, respectively, 0.03 ml/m2 and 0.7 ml/m2, while SAT-50 underestimated RVSV by 6.86 ml/m2 (p < 0.001). In six patients, the degree of RV EDVi underestimation by SAT-50 determined a change of category from dilated to non-dilated RV. Intra- and interobserver variabilities were good to excellent for all methods. Post-processing duration was shorter for SAT compared to standard manual segmentation (5.5 ± 1.7 min vs. 19.5 ± 4.4 min, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION: CMR SAT-30 post-processing is a precise, accurate and time-saving method for biventricular assessment of volumes, ejection fraction and mass in rTOF.

PMID:39476274 | DOI:10.1007/s11547-024-01908-6