Health Policy Plan. 2025 Sep 10:czaf059. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaf059. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
One in five adolescents (10-19) live in sub-Saharan Africa. Despite the availability of policies targeted at this age group, policy formulation, implementation, and gains in adolescent health continue to be underwhelming. Actors or stakeholders are architects of policy, bringing their ideological values, interests, power, and positions to policy formulation and implementation and thus influencing the policy process. We analysed multi-level stakeholder interests, positions, power and their influence on adolescent sexual, reproductive and mental health policy formulation and implementation in Ghana, West Africa, using a single-case study design with multiple embedded sub-units of analysis. The case was defined as actors, their power, interests, positions, and the influence on policy formulation and implementation processes in adolescent sexual, reproductive and mental health. A conceptual framework of conflict and synergies between stakeholder interests, power, and positions and the influence on policy formulation and implementation was used to guide the analysis. Data was obtained from key informant in-depth interviews with 18 global and national level and 16 sub-national level stakeholders; 4 focus group discussions with district health management teams, 9 with frontline health workers and 20 with in and out of school adolescents in four districts in the Greater Accra region of Ghana. The multiple stakeholders in adolescent health, including adolescents themselves, had sometimes synergistic and sometimes divergent and conflicting views on policy agendas, formulation and approaches to implementation. Unresolved conflicts between powerful stakeholders in the public or bureaucratic arena stalled or hampered policy formulation and implementation, whereas consensus and adequate resourcing moved processes forward. It is important to invest effort in understanding actors, their power, positions and interests in context to inform policy content and framing to increase the chances of consensus and effective policy formulation and implementation processes.
PMID:40925607 | DOI:10.1093/heapol/czaf059
