Cureus. 2025 Jul 30;17(7):e89092. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89092. eCollection 2025 Jul.
ABSTRACT
Precipitate labor and neonaticide can present with overlapping features, often posing significant challenges in forensic interpretation. Differentiating between these possibilities is essential for reaching accurate medicolegal conclusions. This case report examines the forensic complexities involved in distinguishing precipitate labor from neonaticide. A father brought a deceased neonate to the hospital, alleging that the mother had fatally slit the infant’s throat. In contrast, the mother claimed the injury occurred accidentally during an unexpected bathroom delivery. She stated that while attempting to cut an umbilical cord looped around the baby’s neck with a blade, she unintentionally caused the fatal wound. Autopsy findings revealed a full-term male neonate with multiple incised wounds on the neck, blunt trauma to the scalp, and bilateral subdural and subarachnoid hemorrhages. The combination of sharp and blunt force injuries, along with conflicting parental accounts, raised concerns about the true circumstances surrounding the death. Further complicating the case were the father’s delayed reporting and his claim of being unaware of the pregnancy. This report highlights the critical need for a comprehensive forensic investigation, including careful correlation of injuries with reported events and consideration of medical, psychological, and social factors in suspected cases of neonaticide.
PMID:40896007 | PMC:PMC12397544 | DOI:10.7759/cureus.89092
