Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb 1. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16642-6. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Previous results from the KEYNOTE-716 trial demonstrated significantly improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) with adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in patients with resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma. We present a post hoc analysis of efficacy according to primary tumor location.
METHODS: KEYNOTE-716 (NCT03553836) is a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, phase III study. Patients aged ≥ 12 years with newly diagnosed, resected stage IIB or IIC melanoma (sentinel node-negative) were randomly assigned (1:1) to pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks (2 mg/kg up to 200 mg for pediatric patients) or placebo. This post hoc analysis evaluated RFS and DMFS by primary tumor location of the head/neck, trunk, or extremities.
RESULTS: Overall, 976 patients were assigned to pembrolizumab (n = 487) or placebo (n = 489). Median follow-up was 39.4 months (range 26.0-51.4). The hazard ratios {HRs (95% confidence interval [CI])} for RFS were 0.60 (0.38-0.93) for the head/neck subgroup, 0.57 (0.38-0.84) for the trunk subgroup, and 0.69 (0.47-1.02) for the extremities subgroup. The HRs (95% CI) for DMFS were 0.65 (0.37-1.14) for the head/neck subgroup, 0.59 (0.38-0.92) for the trunk subgroup, and 0.53 (0.31-0.90) for the extremities subgroup.
CONCLUSION: RFS and DMFS consistently favored adjuvant pembrolizumab over placebo in most subgroups analyzed in this post hoc analysis from the KEYNOTE-716 trial. These results support the benefit of adjuvant pembrolizumab on RFS and DMFS in patients with resected high-risk stage II melanoma, irrespective of primary tumor location.
PMID:39893343 | DOI:10.1245/s10434-024-16642-6
